APPENDICES
Acadians in East Texas Before 1870
These families are arranged chronologically and then
alphabetically.
[this list is still very incomplete]
|
Family |
Arrived |
Texas Counties |
|
GUIDRY |
early
1830s |
Hardin, Jefferson,
Liberty, Orange |
|
CHIASSON |
by 1840 |
Hardin, Jefferson |
|
TRAHAN |
1840s |
Jefferson |
|
DUGAS |
by 1850 |
Chambers, Liberty |
|
BROUSSARD |
by 1850 |
Jefferson |
|
HÉBERT |
before
1853 |
Jefferson |
|
LABAUVE |
late
1850s |
Jackson |
|
GRANGER |
by 1860 |
Harris?, Orange |
|
LEBLANC |
by 1860 |
Harris |
|
LEGER |
by 1850 |
Harris |
|
PART |
by 1860 |
Harris |
|
11 |
|
|
[top of page]
Copyright (c) 2011-26 Steven
A. Cormier
[from the beginning of Book Eight:]
The First Acadians in
Louisiana
The Broussards were
not the first Acadians to come to the colony. Nor, as
legend would have it, did the first Acadian exiles, like Evangeline of Longfellow's poem, reach Louisiana
during the 1750s via the upper Mississippi.
In many histories
touching on the Acadians in Louisiana
published since the early 1800s, examples abound of the
enduring myth that Acadians arrived there in the 1750s via the
Appalachian passes. One of the first accounts of the Acadian
odyssey to the lower Mississippi is that of state supreme court
judge
François-Xavier Martin, whose two-volume history of Louisiana
was published in 1827. Only a shadow of
the actual Acadian experience in exile can be detected in Judge
Martin's sweeping account: "Thus beggared," he writes of the Acadians' dispersal, "these people were, in small
numbers and at different periods, cast on the sandy shores of the
southern provinces, among a people of whose language they were
ignorant and who knew not theirs, whose manners and education were
different from their own, whose religion they abhorred and who were
rendered odious to them, as the friends and countrymen of those who
had so cruelly treated them, and whom they continued as a less
savage foe, than he who wields the tomahawk and the scalping knife.
It is due to the descendants of the British colonies," Judge Martin
waxes on, "to say that their sires received with humanity, kindness
and hospitality those who so severely smarted under the calamities
of war. In every province, the humane example of the
legislature of Pennsylvania, was followed, and the colonial treasury
was opened to relieve the sufferers; and private charity was not
outdone by the public. Yet, but a few accepted the profered
relief and sat down on the land that was offered them." Judge
Martin's narrative, under the heading for 1756, plunges headlong
into the overland myth: "The others fled westerly," he says of
the exiles, "from what appeared to them a hostile shore--wandering
till they found themselves out of sight of any who spoke the English
language. They crossed the mighty spine and wintered among the
Indians. The scattered parties, thrown off on the coast of
every colony from Pennsylvania to Georgia, united, and trusting
themselves to the western waters, sought the land on which the
spotless banner waved, and the waves of the Mississippi brought them
to New Orleans." Judge Martin then indulges in a wonderful
fiction found in no contemporary record: "The levee and square
of that city presented, on their arrival, a spectacle not unlike
that they offered, about a quarter century before, on the landing of
the woman and children snatched from the hands of the Natchez.
Like these, the Acadians were greeted with tenderness and
hospitality; every house in the city afforded a shelter to some of
these unfortunate people. Charity burst open the door of the
cloister, and the nuns ministered with profusion and cheerfulness to
the wants of the unprotected of their sex." Judge Martin
continues, again without having consulted a contemporary record:
"Kerlerec and Auberville allotted a tract to each family: they
were supplied with farming utensils at the king's expense, and
during the first year the same rations were distributed to them
out of the king's stores, as to the troops. They settled above
the German coast, on both sides of the Mississippi, and in course
of time their plantations connected the latter settlement with that
of Baton Rouge and Pointe Coupee. It is, at this day, known by
the appellation of the Acadian coast." But the judge says
nothing of these first arrivals settling on the prairies west of the
Atchafalaya Basin. Later in his narrative, Judge Martin
adds: "On the fall of Canada [in 1760] a number of the
colonists, unwilling to live under their conquerors, sought the warm
clime over which the spotless banner still waved; most of them
settled in the neighbourhood of the Acadians [on the lower
Mississippi]. Others of a more roving disposition crossed the
lakes that separate the right bank of the Mississippi from the
western prairies and began the settlements of Attakapas, Opelousas
and Avoyelles." Notice that Judge Martin says nothing of
Acadians settling in the prairie districts.
Beginning in the late 1840s, not long after Judge
Martin's passing, Creole historian Charles Étienne Arthur Gayarré published a history of his native state. In a later edition of
his work, for which he consulted colonial records only recently made
available, Gayarré says nothing of Acadians reaching
Louisiana during the 1750s, as he had in earlier editions. He offers, instead, a more
accurate account of their arrival in the colony: "Thus, between the 1st of
January and the 13th of May, 1765," Gayarré relates, "about six
hundred and fifty Acadians had arrived at New Orleans, and from that
town had been sent to form settlements in Attakapas and Opelousas,
under the command of Andry. In one of his despatches to his
government, the Commissary Foucault observed that these settlements
would, in a few years, rise to considerable importance...."
Gayarré says nothing of Acadian settlements above the German Coast
in the context of the 1765 arrivals but places them there a few
years later, during the early Spanish period. Despite his careful research,
however, he missed entirely the arrival of Acadians from Georgia in February 1764.
Not so
the next author of a multi-volume history of Louisiana. Alcée
Fortier, professor of linguistics at Tulane University, published a
two-volume history in 1904. Like Gayarré, Professor Fortier delved deeply
into the available colonial records, so only a few errors mar his
account of the first Acadians to reach Louisiana: "On April 6, 1764," Fortier relates, "D'Abbadie
announced the arrival in New Orleans of four Acadian families,
twenty persons. They had come from New York." A few
pages later, the professor continues: "On February 28, 1765,
Foucault, the commissaire ordonnateur, wrote to the minister
that a few days previously several Acadian families, to the number
of one hundred and ninety-three persons, had come over from Santo
Domingo [French St.-Domingue]. They were poor, and worthy of pity, and assistance
was given to them until they could choose lands at the Opelousas and
be in a condition to help themselves. On May 4," Fortier
continues, "Foucault
announced the arrival of eighty more Acadians, whom he intended to
send to the Attakapas; and on May 18, of forty-eight Acadian
families, which he sent also to the Opelousas and the Attakapas.
On November 16, 1766, Foucault announced the arrival from Halifax[sic]
of two hundred and sixteen Acadians. Gayarré," Fortier
explains, "says lands on
both sides of the Mississippi, above the German Coast, were given to
them, and they settled there as far as Baton Rouge and Pointe Coupée."
Like Gayarré before him, Professor Fortier, though he misidentified
the origin of the 1766 arrivals, says nothing of Acadians
coming to Louisiana in the 1750s. He, in fact, notes that
"Judge Martin, in his History of Louisiana, says the Acadians
arrived in 1755 and received lands along the Mississippi coast.
Martin, however, gives no authority for his statement"--for the
simple reason that there was none.
Later in
the twentieth-century, however, Louisiana and Canadian historians
resurrected the 1750s-overland myth. Sidney Marchand's Ascension Parish, first
published in 1931, insists: "At irregular intervals
following the year 1757, a stream of the exiles continued to pour
into Louisiana, until more than 4000 had taken up their abode in
what is now the southern portion of the state. An interesting
group of 216, who came direct from Halifax, Nova Scotia, landed in
New Orleans on Nov. 16, 1766. They were sent to Cabahanosse ... which settlement soon became known as the Acadian
Coast (Ascension and St. James)." Oscar Winzerling,
in his otherwise excellent history of the Acadian exiles of 1785,
states in his conclusion to Acadian Odyssey, first published in 1955: "The seven [ships'] expeditions
[of 1785] formed but half of Acadian immigration to the state[sic] of
Louisiana. For these Acadians and those other three or four
thousand who, between 1755 and 1776, filtered from the American
colonies and the West Indies into Louisiana, the cruel expulsions of
1755 were gone with the clouds of the Seven Years' War." In
truth, "only" about 1,300 Acadians "filtered" in from
Georgia,
Halifax, Maryland, and St.-Domingue in the first decade of Acadian
settlement in Louisiana.
What Winzerling's passage does reveal is the imprecision of Acadian
studies as late as the mid-1950s as to the number of Acadians who came to Louisiana
in the earliest years of their migration there, and, especially, the
date of their first arrival. The same holds true for Lillian C.
Bourgeois's effort, entitled Cabanocey: The History,
Customs and Folklore of St. James Parish, first published in
1957 and revised as late as 1998, which places the first exiles on the
river above New Orleans. Her comments on the matter begin
solidly enough: "The story of the Acadians has been told with
many variations by as many people," she acknowledges at the
beginning of her chapter, "The Acadians Arrive." "Actually no
one has proved who were the first Acadians to reach Louisiana, where
they settled, and whence they came," which was certainly true in the
late 1950s. She debunks the claim that 20 exiles reached
Cabahannocer, now St. James, in 1755, pointing out that
"Cabahannocer had not yet been founded." Moreover, she
explains, "the distance to be traveled, the rigors of winter, and
the poor transportation then available would make the arrival of any
deported Acadians before 1756 impossible." She then succumbs
to "the Mouton legend that the first Acadians to
reach Louisiana were the Salvator Moutons and that
they settled in St. James Parish in 1756. Now in 1756," she
continues, "St. James was a wilderness and any Acadians who arrived
here had, of necessity, to settle near some other settler in order
to survive. One of the first, if not the first, settler in St.
James was Matthias Frederick who was here as early,
or earlier than, 1756. His habitation was near Vacharie about
six miles from Cabahannocer. Early records show that the
Moutons settled near Matthias Frederick in the
environs of Vacherie. Had the Moutons come
with the later Acadians in 1765 [they had] it is probable that they
would have settled nearer Cabahannocer [they most likely did].
They are not listed in the census of Cabahannocer of [April] 1766.
Yet they were residents of St. James; they are listed in the militia
of that year; Salvador, Jean, and Louis Mouton."
Her reasoning then collapses before the mighty legend: "This
suggests that the Moutons may have arrived here
before the other Acadians and settled near Matthias
Frederick because Cabahannocer had not yet been founded.
The Mouton legend could be true." A
decade after the first appearance of Bourgeois's study, Bona
Arsenault's History, published in 1966 in both
French and English versions, continued the 1750s arrival myth, in spades. The
Canadian genealogist-turned-historian states, under
the heading "Arrival of the First Acadians in Louisiana": "It
is our belief that a number of Acadians deported in 1755 to
Maryland, the Carolinas and Georgia most certainly succeeded in
reaching Louisiana, in 1756. For example, we know that the
Acadians who disembarked in South Carolina had no trouble getting
permission to leave. Among those exiled to other American
colonies, a number of them headed for the Mississippi either by sea,
or by following certain rivers. Others escaped from the
transports which brought them to Virginia in the fall of 1755, and
before these vessels were directed to England in the beginning of
1756. It was to these first Acadians of Louisiana that
Longfellow referred, in his Evangeline, when he wrote:
'Past the Ohio shore and past the mouth of the Wabash,
'Into the
golden stream of the broad and swift Mississippi,
'Floated a
cumbrous boat, that was rowed by Acadian boatmen.
'It was a
band of exiles; a raft, as it were, from the shipwrecked
'Nation,
scattered along the coast, now floating together,
'Bound by the
bonds of a common belief and a common misfortune;
'Men and women and
children, who, guided by hope or hearsay,
'Sought for their kin and
their kind among the few-acred farmers,
'On the Acadian coast, and
the prairie of fair Opelousas.
'On ward o'er sunken sands,
through a wilderness sombre with forests,
'Day after day they
glided down the turbulent river;
'Night after night, by their
blazing fires, encamped on its borders
'Now through rushing chutes,
among green islands, where plumelike
'Cotton-trees nodded their
shadowy crests, they swept with the current...'"
A wonderful
tale, to be sure, but, alas, pure fiction. Bona Arsenault continues: "Felix Voorhies, an
eminent judge of Louisiana, in Acadian Reminiscences,
published at the turn of the century [1907], tells the touching story of a
group of Acadians deported to Maryland in 1755 and who, a few years
later, succeeded in reaching Louisiana. This story was related
to him by his grandmother, an Acadian who had been one of the exiles in
that group. Having received help and shelter from Irish
families in Maryland, these Acadians acquired horses and covered
wagons and courageously began the long trek west. After
crossing Virginia and the mountainous country of North Carolina,
they reached the Tennessee River. They had been on the move
two months. Learning that they could reach Louisiana more
easily by riding the strong river currents, they sold the horses and
wagons, felled trees and built rafts. They floated down the
Tennessee, reached the Mississippi, Bayou Plaquemine and, finally,
Bayou Teche along which they settled. This was in the region
of the Attakapas post, in present-day St. Martinville. Charles Gayarré,
a Louisiana historian, wrote that Acadian refugees arrived on the
Mississippi in a steady stream immediately after their deportation
to the English colonies and right up until the Treaty of Paris of
1763; but, it is impossible to ascertain their number."
Arsenault evidently was referring to Gayarré's earlier work. As
explained above, Gayarré says nothing of such early arrivals in his
later histories.
Entrepreneur-turned-politician Dudley J.
LeBlanc, who served in the Louisiana state senate beginning in the
1940s, perhaps was the most vociferous proponent of the
1750s-overland scenario.
"The story of the Acadians has been told often and many people have
written about it,
but no one actually knows when the first Acadians reached Louisiana,"
the Senator wrote in his
history of the Acadians, first published in 1927. Senator
LeBlanc continues: "As soon as the Acadians deported to
Georgia arrived there, Governor Reynolds permitted them to leave.
The unfortunate people made crude boats, others took to the woods
heading for Canada or back to Acadia, while some joined Acadians
from South Carolina and traveled through the great wilderness which
separated them from the Gulf of Mexico and Louisiana via woods and
water ways as they followed the paths of the earliest travelers down
to the Mississippi River." To buttress his assertion, Senator
LeBlanc, in a later edition of his history, quotes the research notes,
published in 1962,
of two members of the Louisiana
Genealogical and Historical Society, Mrs. Stephen Roy Campbell and
Dr. Isobel French: "'We
are mainly interested in the Acadians who went to South Carolina and
Georgia, as from these a small group of those who escaped were the
first to travel the well-known Canadian Route through the forests
and water ways on to the Mississippi River and Louisiana.'"
The two researchers cite Dr. Chapman J. Milling's study of Acadian exiles
in South Carolina, first published in 1943: "'Some made
crude boats. Others took to the woods heading for
Canada, while others, joined by escaped parties of Acadians from
Georgia, made their way to Louisiana. A reference to such a
party is made in an article in the South Carolina Gazette, said
party leaving in May 1756. The route from Canada to Louisiana
via woods and water ways, particularly the Mississippi River, was
the very first route known and used by explorers, missionaries,
voyagers, coureur de bois, etc. It required, we are told,
approximately a month to travel from South Carolina to Louisiana.'"
Senator LeBlanc then asserts: "As the wild
ducks regularly came from Canada and the East to roost in an ideal
pasture, at Cabahanoce (Indian name for duck's sleeping place), so
came the early Acadians to find a haven of refuge on French soil
which had been settled by the earliest Canadian and French pioneers
at 'Les Oumas' or 'Houmas', twenty-two leagues above New Orleans.
This thinly populated area offered rich and choice lands along the
Mississippi River, at a time when concessions could be had on the
vast grants. De Sennegy, whose early and authentic book on St.
James is based on church archives and from family records of leading
families of those days, dates the earliest Acadian arrivals in
small, straggling weary groups between the year 1754-1759."
The Senator adds: "Some Acadians seem to have come to 'Houmas'
or St. James via Pointe Coupée even before the deportation of
1755. In the registers of St. Francis Church, Pointe
Coupee Acadian names appear in the entries of the early
seventeen-fifties. We find names like Hebert and Richard in the books. This seems to confirm the tradition
that some Acadians, having been able to get away from Acadia into
Canada during the long tense years prior to 1755, came from there to
Louisiana."
As late as 1979, one encounters passages such as this in
William Faulkner Rushton's The Cajuns: "Upon arriving in Louisiana
in 1754, Salvador and Jean Diogène Mouton and their families
were thrust into the company of highly advanced Indians who, as in
Nova Scotia, lived near the lands the Acadians settled."
Rushton's chronology asserts: "1754--Five Mouton
brothers and one nephew begin their immigration to Louisiana, the
first Cajun settlers in the state." And, again under the
heading 1754: "April 6--The first fully documented arrival of
Cajun refugees in Louisiana: four families, totaling twenty
people, who had arrived via New York." Under the heading 1756, we find: "Scattered Acadian
refugees dumped in Maryland, the Carolinas, and Georgia begin
heading for Louisiana." And: "1757--The first chapel is
established at St. James Parish, soon to become the principal
settlement of the Acadian Coast along Louisiana's Mississippi
River." Also: "1761--In Louisiana, the first Cajun name
appears in the cattle industry's so-called brand book: Bernard." And, finally, "1764--In December a boatload
of 20 refugees turns up in New Orleans." Every assertion
undocumented, in a work filled with other gross inaccuracies.
By the 1980s, however,
scholars such as Glenn
R. Conrad and Carl A. Brasseaux of the University of Southwestern
Louisiana, today's University of Louisiana at Lafayette, helped resurrect the true history of the first Acadians in
Louisiana. Brasseaux's
In Search of Evangeline, published in 1988,
offers a discussion of the Evangeline/Emmeline Labiche myth, which
includes the improbable movement of Acadians from Maryland to
Louisiana via the Appalachian passes and the Tennessee, Ohio, and
Mississippi river valleys, à la Longfellow's fictional Evangeline. Brasseaux informs us that
it was early nineteenth-century Louisiana historians François-Xavier Martin
and René de Sennegy, both cited by Senator LeBlanc, who created the myth of
Acadians taking an overland route to Louisiana. He
says of a later proponent of the myth: "Like Longfellow,
[Judge Felix] Voorhies depended upon his imagination for the
trans-Appalachian journey, an episode for which factual information
was understandably lacking, since it never took place."
Brasseaux concludes: "The Maryland [as well as South Carolina and Georgia]
Acadians knew the dangers and difficulties of overland travel and
consistently traveled to Louisiana aboard chartered merchant vessels
whose departures from Maryland and arrivals at New Orleans are well
documented. On the other hand, the voluminous materials relating
to Acadian immigration into Louisiana fail to yield a single piece of
evidence to substantiate the use of an overland route."
In an even more comprehensive work
on The Founding of New Acadia, published in 1987,
Brasseaux explains:
"... it is certain that the overland odyssey described in Felix Voorhies'
Acadian
Reminiscences has no basis in fact. The vigilance of
colonial forces ordered to fire at Acadians approaching the
Appalachian frontier, the belligerence of trans-Appalachian Indian
tribes both during and after the Seven Years' War, and the exiles'
general ignorance of the interior routes to Louisiana militated
against a transcontinental trek. It is also certain that few,
if any, Acadians reached the lower Mississippi Valley via Quebec.
Indeed, Acadian refugees in Quebec appear to have ventured no
further south than Detroit, where one couple was married on January
3, 1773."301
And so, among serious
historians at least, the legend is now itself a legend. Despite his imprecise sources
and erroneous conclusions,
Senator LeBlanc at least was correct about the British colony
from whence the first documented Acadian exiles came.
He even deduced correctly the place where they settled after they
reached Louisiana. But he
missed
by many hundreds of miles the actual route they took, and
the date on which they arrived he missed by many years.301a
NOTES:
301.
Quotations from Martin, F.-X., Louisiana, 1:328-29, 336; Gayarré,
Louisiana, 2:121-22; Fortier, Louisiana, 1:147, 152-53; Marchand, Ascension Parish, 20; Winzerling,
Acadian Odyssey, 161; Bourgeois, Cabanocey, 11-12; Arsenault, History, 191-92; LeBlanc, Acadian Miracle, 311-13,
(italics added
in sixth quotation); Ruston, The Cajuns, 78, 316-17, 319;
Brasseaux,
In Search of Evangeline, 21-23, (italics added in second
quotation); Brasseaux, Founding of New Acadia, 105.
See also William H. Adams," Martin, François Xavier," in DLB,
551-52;
Brasseaux, "A New Acadia,"
123-24;
Brasseaux, Founding of New Acadia, 73, 105;
Brasseaux, In Search of Evangeline, 20-21; BRDR,
vols. 1b, 2; Clark, A. H., Acadia, 364, quoting J. B. Brebner's
New England's Outpost, published in 1927; Dugas, "An Immigrants' Journey"; Fortier, 1:158; O. C. Guillot, "LeBlanc, Dudley J. ("Couzin Dud")," in DLB,
495-96; LeBlanc, 314-15; Oubre, Vacherie,
57, 73; Plank, Unsettled Conquest, 209n25; Book Five.
F.-X. Martin was a native of
Marseille, lived for a time in Martinique, & spent years at Newbern, NC,
before emigrating to LA, where he became a judge in New Orleans. See Adams; Dugas. The judge's time in NC may explain
his feelings toward the English colonists & the "charity" they offered
the Acadian exiles in 1755. See Book Five.
For the Moutons
actual arrival in LA, see notes 341
& 346, below. Here's a
hint: they did not even come with the Broussard
party in Feb 1765, much less with the first documented Acadian
exiles who reached LA in Feb 1764.
For Senator LeBlanc's
bio, see Guillot. The Senator lived from 1894 to 1971. His The True Story of
the Acadians was published in 1927, The Improved Version in
1932, & Acadian Miracle, quoted here, in 1966. LeBlanc's
"health" product, Hadacol, made him wealthy. He also was a popular
broadcaster & was active in the creation of CODOFIL, The Council for
the Development of French in Louisiana, authorized by the state
legislature in 1968. See <https://www.crt.state.la.us/cultural-development/codofil/index>
This researcher has been unable to find Senator LeBlanc's quotation
in a 1990 reprint of Milling, Exile Without End. Perhaps
the quotation was included in the original edition of 1943 but removed
by the editors of the reprinted edition, used in this study.
That Héberts & Richards
appear in the Pointe Coupée church records of the 1750s does not mean
that they were Acadian members of those families. In fact,
they were
not. See BRDR, vol. 1b, which covers the years 1722-69.
There are Héberts listed in this volume, but all of them are
Acadians, & the sacramental records--3 marriages & a baptism--are dated
26 Sep 1767, 26 Mar 1769, & 27 Mar 1769. See BRDR, 1b:86
(PCP-3, 236, 280; PCP-4, 20, 38-39).
The only family name close to Hébert is Erber or
Herbert, & close
examination shows them to be from Île de Ré, France, not Acadia.
See BRDR, 1b:86-87. For the Richards at Pointe Coupée, see
BRDR, 1b:157-59. Only 1 Richard sacramental record is for
an Acadian, a baptismal record dated 26 Mar 1769; the other 8 are for
non-Acadians, & close examination of those records shows that these
Richards were from France, specifically Avignon & Hannonois. The Senator
also devotes several pages to a misreading of St.
James church records that mention Acadians. See
pp.
314-15, in which he insists these church records
put Acadians at St. James in
1757 & 1759. A perusal of BRDR, vol. 2, reveals no such
dates for these St. James church records relating to Acadian Poiriers
& Richards.
For a critique of De Sennegy, pseudonym of Aldric Lettin de la
Peychardière, see
Brasseaux, In Search of Evangeline.
Brasseaux, Founding of New Acadia, published in 1987, opens chap. 5 with the confusing passage: "Between 1757 and 1770 approximately one
thousand Acadians migrated to Louisiana...." (The number was
closer to 1,300. See
Appendix.)
Where does the professor get 1757? Which Acadians came to LA
at that date? If they did not come overland, as he later insists in his
In Search of Evangeline,
did they come by sea? From where? Who were they?
Where did they settle? Or is this simply a
misprint in an otherwise superb piece of scholarship?
For exceptions to Brasseaux's assertion in Founding of New
Acadia, 105, that
"few, if any, Acadians reached the lower Mississippi Valley via
Quebec," see notes 471c
& 471g, below.
Today's serious scholarship on the Acadians of LA follows the work
of Brasseaux. E.g., Oubre, 57,
published in 2002: "Possibly, a few Acadian
stragglers started to reach the French settlements of colonial
Louisiana within a few years of the deportations. This has
never been established as a fact, and the possibility is discounted
by most researchers." Oubre, 73,
states: "There is another historic marker across the highway [from
St. James Church] stating, 'Site of First Acadian Settlers in Louisiana.
Refugees came overland 1756-57," & concludes: "Obviously, there is
no documentation that anybody came overland at that early date."
301a.
Amazingly,
the 1750s-arrival myth still finds its way into recent scholarship.
In an article published in
Louisiana History during the summer of 2009, Gilbert C. Din, one
of the finest historians working today, while describing the Acadian diaspora, makes the startling assertion:
"By 1759, the new arrivals were taking up residence on the
Mississippi above New Orleans in an area that became the Acadian
Coast." See Din, "Empires Too Far,"
274.
Five years later, Din is still writing: "In as much as
Louisiana was still French in 1759, they [the Acadians] preferred to
resettle there, and Acadians began moving to the colony where local
authorities assisted them in settling down." See Din,
Populating the Barrera, 4, published in 2014.
copied here 22 Oct 2026